Abstract: In this article, the authors cited references 19–36 in contexts where they became redundant. While the authors acknowledge the value of these references, due to inappropriate locations they have repositioned the citations throughout the article to enhance clarity and coherence. Additionally, the authors have included a typographical error in Table 2 with the ‘Poisson ν’ and ‘Young's Modulus E [MPa]’ values for ‘Cancellous’ showing as switched. The authors have confirmed that the values ‘100’ and 0.2′ are to be switched. In the original article, the following statements were used to cite references 19–36 in Section ‘2.3 Simulation – mechanical properties, constraint system, contacts and methods’: “… The bone material of the vertebrae consists of two parts, cortical and cancellous. The mechanical properties have been modelled as a homogeneous and isotropic material [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. There are different approaches in literature for modelling the cortical and cancellous structure, some authors use orthotropic models, however, in the scientific literature the simplification to isotropic material is widely used [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,26,36] …” The statements in Section ‘2.3 Simulation – mechanical properties, constraint system, contacts and methods’ is updated to include only references [20], [26], [29] and [30]. The updated statement should be as below: “… The bone material of the vertebrae consists of two parts, cortical and cancellous. The mechanical properties have been modelled as a homogeneous and isotropic material [20, 26]. There are different approaches in literature for modelling the cortical and cancellous structure, some authors use orthotropic models, however, in the scientific literature the simplification to isotropic material is widely used [29,30] …” The citation [19] has been moved to ‘Section 1. Introduction’. The original statement can be found below: “Unfortunately, a range of disorders and diseases can compromise the integrity and functioning of the spine, leading to pain, disability, and a reduced quality of life …” The correct version of the statement with citation [19] added should be as below: “Unfortunately, a range of disorders and diseases can compromise the integrity and functioning of the spine, leading to pain, disability, and a reduced quality of life [19] …” The citation [21] has been moved to Section ‘2.3 Simulation – mechanical properties, constraint system, contacts and methods’. The original statement can be found below: “… Four loading conditions were simulated, which involved a compressive force of a maximum value of 1000 N, to which was added, individually, a rotational load …” The correct version of the statement with citation [21] added should be as below: “… Four loading conditions were simulated, which involved a compressive force of a maximum value of 1000 N, to which was added, individually, a rotational load [21] …” The citation [22] has been moved to Section ‘1. Introduction’. The original statement can be found below: “… Age plays a pivotal role in the distribution of lesions …” The correct version of the statement with citation [22] added should be as below: Age plays a pivotal role in the distribution of lesions [22] …” The citation [23] has been moved to Section ‘2.3 Simulation – mechanical properties, constraint system, contacts and methods’. The original statement can be found below: “… The Poisson coefficient (Eq. (2.1)) will depend on two other coefficients, namely structural damping (Eq. (2.2)) and volumetric deformation (Eq. (2.3)) [40] …” The correct version of the statement with citation [23] added should be as below: “… The Poisson coefficient [23] (Eq. (2.1)) will depend on two other coefficients, namely structural damping (Eq. (2.2)) and volumetric deformation (Eq. (2.3)) [40] …” The citations [24] and [25] have been moved to Section ‘2.3 Simulation – mechanical properties, constraint system, contacts and methods’. The original statement can be found below: “… The authors were able to apply compressive loads up to over 1000 N without any sign of instability …” The correct version of the statement with citations [24] and [25] added should be as below: “… The authors were able to apply compressive loads up to over 1000 N without any sign of instability [24,25] …” The citation [27] has been moved to Section ‘1. Introduction’. The original statement can be found below: “… Over the years, research and clinical practice have led to the development of various treatment techniques aimed at restoring stability and proper functioning of the spine …” The correct version of the statement with citation [27] added should be as below: “… Over the years, research and clinical practice have led to the development of various treatment techniques aimed at restoring stability and proper functioning of the spine [27] …” The citation [28] has been moved to Section ‘2.1 Anatomy of the lower part of the spine and diseases’. The original statement can be found below: “… When the intervertebral disc deteriorates or ruptures, it can cause pain and dysfunction in the spine …” The correct version of the statement with citation [28] added should be as below: “… When the intervertebral disc deteriorates or ruptures, it can cause pain and dysfunction in the spine [28] …” The citation [31] has been moved to Section ‘4.3 Range of motion’. The original statement can be found below: “… Therefore, the simulation can be improved, e.g. by including the muscular apparatus …” The correct version of the statement with citation [31] added should be as below: “… Therefore, the simulation can be improved, e.g. by including the muscular apparatus [31] …” The citation [32] has been moved to Section ‘1. Introduction’. The original statement can be found below: “‥Among the various treatment approaches for spine stabilization, the Lateral Mass Screw (LMS) is an established method used for treating a wide range of spinal conditions …” The correct version of the statement with citation [32] added should be as below: “‥Among the various treatment approaches for spine stabilization, the Lateral Mass Screw (LMS) is an established method used for treating a wide range of spinal conditions [32] …” The citation [33] has been moved to Section ‘2.1 Anatomy of the lower part of the spine and diseases’. The original statement can be found below: “… Diseases that can affect the intervertebral disc include disc herniation, disc degeneration and spinal stenosis …” The correct version of the statement with citation [33] added should be as below: “… Diseases that can affect the intervertebral disc include disc herniation, disc degeneration and spinal stenosis [33] …” The citation [34] has been moved to Section ‘1. Introduction’. The original statement can be found below: “ …. These areas show the highest rates of degeneration, affirming the notion that these zones are particularly exposed to mechanical stresses and thus at greater risk …” The correct version of the statement with citation [34] added should be as below: “ …. These areas show the highest rates of degeneration, affirming the notion that these zones are particularly exposed to mechanical stresses and thus at greater risk [34] …” The citation [35] has been moved to Section ‘3.3 Range of motion’. The original statement can be found below: “… The Range of Motion (ROM) is a crucial aspect of spinal biomechanics, representing the relative range of motion between various pairs of vertebrae, in our case study these are L4-L5 and L5-S1 (Table 13) …” The correct version of the statement with citation [35] added should be as below: “… The Range of Motion (ROM) is a crucial aspect of spinal biomechanics, representing the relative range of motion between various pairs of vertebrae [35], in our case study these are L4-L5 and L5-S1 (Table 13) …” The citation [36] has been moved to Section ‘2.3 Simulation – mechanical properties, constraint system, contacts and methods’. The original statement can be found below: “… The elements were arranged in the anatomical direction given in the literature [41] (Table 4) …” The correct version of the statement with citation [36] added should be as below: “… The elements were arranged in the anatomical direction given in the literature [36, 41] (Table 4) …” The original version of Table 2 can be found below: [Table presented] The table has been updated so that the value of ‘100’ for ‘Poisson v’ of ‘Cancellous’ is switched with value ‘0.2’ for ‘Young's Modulus E [MPa]’ values of ‘Cancellous’ The correct version of the table should be as below: [Table presented] The references associated with the changes can be found below: [19] S.J. Atlas, R.A. Deyo, Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting, J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16 (2001) 120–131. [20] C.-S. Chen, C.-K. Cheng, C.-L. Liu, W.-H. Lo, Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine, Med. Eng. Phys. 23 (2001) 485–493. [21] F. Heuer, H. Schmidt, L. Claes, H.-J. Wilke, A new laser scanning technique for imaging intervertebral disc displacement and its application to modelling nucleotomy, Clin. Biomech. 23 (2008) 260–269. [22] F. Heuer, H. Schmidt, Z. Klezl, L. Claes, H.-J. Wilke, Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle, J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 271–280. [23] H.-M. Lin, Y.-N. Pan, C.-L. Liu, L.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Huang, C.-S. Chen, Biomechanical comparison of the K-ROD and Dynesys dynamic spinal fixator systems – a finite element analysis, Bio Med. Mater. Eng. 23 (2013) 495–505. [24] D.W. McMillan, D.S. McNally, G. Garbutt, M.A. Adams, Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs: the validity of experimental ‘stress profilometry, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 210 (1996) 81–87. [25] A. Rohlmann, S. Neller, L. Claes, G. Bergmann, H.-J. Wilke, Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine, Spine 26 (2001) E557–E561. [26] H. Schmidt, M. Bashkuev, M. Dreischarf, A. Rohlmann, G. Duda, H.-J. Wilke, A. Shirazi-Adl, Computational biomechanics of a lumbar motion segment in pure and combined shear loads, J. Biomech. 46 (2013) 2513–2521. [27] A.Y.L. Wong, G. Harada, R. Lee, S.D. Gandhi, A. Dziedzic, A. Espinoza-Orias, M. Parnianpour, P.K. Louie, B. Basques, H.S. An, D. Samartzis, Preoperative paraspinal neck muscle characteristics predict early onset adjacent segment degeneration in anterior cervical fusion patients: a machine-learning modelling analysis, J. Orthop. Res. 39 (2021) 1732–1744. [28] I. Yamamoto, M.M. Panjabi, T. Crisco, T. Oxland, Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint, Spine 14 (1989) 1256–1260.] [29] A. Faizan, A. Kiapour, A.M. Kiapour, V.K. Goel, Biomechanical analysis of various footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion devices, J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 27 (2014) E118–E127. [30] V.K. Goel, A. Mehta, J. Jangra, A. Faizan, A. Kiapour, R.W. Hoy, A.R. Fauth, Anatomic facet replacement system (afrs) restoration of lumbar segment mechanics to intact: a finite element study and in vitro cadaver investigation, Int. J. Spine Surg. 1 (2007) 46–54. [31] Y. Guan, N. Yoganandan, J. Moore, F.A. Pintar, J. Zhang, D.J. Maiman, P. Laud, Moment–rotation responses of the human lumbosacral spinal column, J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 1975–1980. [32] A. Kiapour, D.G. Anderson, D.B. Spenciner, L. Ferrara, V.K. Goel, Kinematic effects of a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, J. Neurosurg. Spine 17 (2012) 314–320. [33] A. Nachemson, Lumbar intradiscal pressure: experimental studies on post-mortem material, Acta Orthop. Scand. 31 (1960) 1–104. [34] M.M. Panjabi, T.R. Oxland, I. Yamamoto, J.J. Crisco, Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional loaddisplacement curves, J. Bone Jt. Surg. 76 (1994) 413–424. [35] M.J. Pearcy, Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion, Acta Orthop. Scand. 56 (1985) 1–45. [36] Z.-C. Zhong, S.-H. Wei, J.-P. Wang, C.-K. Feng, C.-S. Chen, C. Yu, Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method, Med. Eng. Phys. 28 (2006) 90–98.